System windows data error 40 bindingexpression path error

I’m banging my head on my desk with this binding error.. I have checked several of the postings for the BindingExpression path error and cannot see anything that works with my situation.

Anyway, I have a custom control called IncrementingTextBox. I am trying to disable it whenever the user ‘checks’ the CheckBox above it.

I have a binding on the CheckBox IsChecked property that is working fine and is firing when it is supposed to. It is correctly setting the UseSensorLength property on the ConfigurationModel.

However, the binding on the IncrementingTextBox IsEnabled property is causing a BindingExpression path error and so doesn’t update at all.

As a test, I tried in the code behind to enable and disable the control and it works just fine, but I can’t seem to get the Binding to work on it.

Here is a snippet from my xaml:

...

DataContext="{Binding RelativeSource={RelativeSource Self}}"

...
...

<CheckBox Content="Use Sensor Length" Margin="30,6,0,0" 
          IsChecked="{Binding ConfigurationModel.UseSensorLength, Mode=TwoWay}"/>

<local:IncrementingTextBox x:Name="video_length_textbox" Margin="0,0,0,5" 
                           IsTextEnabled="False" 
                           IsEnabled="{Binding ConfigurationModel.DontUseSensorLength}" 
                           ValueChanged="VideoEventValueChanged"/>

And Here is a snippet from my ConfigurationModel:

public bool DontUseSensorLength
{
    get { return !UseSensorLength; }
}

public bool UseSensorLength
{
   get { return _useSensorLength; }
   set 
   { 
      _useSensorLength = value; 
      OnPropertyChanged("UseSensorLength"); 
      OnPropertyChanged("DontUseSensorLength");
   }
}

Here is the error message I am getting in my output window when running the app:

System.Windows.Data Error: 40 : BindingExpression path error:
‘ConfigurationModel’ property not found on ‘object’
»IncrementingTextBox’ (Name=’video_length_textbox’)’.
BindingExpression:Path=ConfigurationModel.DontUseSensorLength;
DataItem=’IncrementingTextBox’ (Name=’video_length_textbox’); target
element is ‘IncrementingTextBox’ (Name=’video_length_textbox’); target
property is ‘IsEnabled’ (type ‘Boolean’)

Remember, the ‘UseSensorLength’ property binding is working fine, but the ‘DontUseSensorLength’ binding is causing the above ‘BindingExpression path error’.

Greetings;

        public CallStackDialog(Window owner,
               FormattedStackTrace stackTrace)
        {
            InitializeComponent();
            this.Owner = owner;

            StackTrace = stackTrace;
            DataContext = StackTrace;

            return;
        }

        private FormattedStackTrace formattedStackTrace;

        public FormattedStackTrace StackTrace
        {
            get
            {
                return formattedStackTrace;
            }

            set
            {
                formattedStackTrace = value;
                NotifyPropertyChanged("StackTrace");
            }
        }

3.) The FormattedStackTrace class contains an instance of List<OrderedCall> as an auto property named OrderedStackTrace.  I am trying to bind this collection as the ItemsSource for the DataGrid in the window. The relative members of the FormattedStackTrace,
which is the backing reference type for the Window’s DataContext, is as follows:

    public class FormattedStackTrace
    {
#region FormattedStackTrace Class Data Members & Auto-Properties

        private StackFrame[] sourceStackFrame;
        public MethodBase CallingMethod { get; private set; }
        public List<OrderedCall> OrderedStackTrace { get; private set; }

#endregion
    }

OrderedStackTrace is a List<OrderedCall>, where each List member is an instance of the following structure:

    public struct OrderedCall
    {
        public int Call;
        public string Method;
    }; 

At the point where the DataContext is set inside the parent Window’s class constructor, the OrderedStackTrace property is correct, in that it contains the expected number of OrderedCall instance values, and they can be viewed without issue inside any of the
Debugging tabs inside Visual Studio 2010, or inside the IDE’s Immediate Window:

    ? StackTrace.OrderedStackTrace == null
    false
    ? StackTrace.OrderedStackTrace.Count
    40
    ? StackTrace.OrderedStackTrace[39]
    {WPFEventHandling.OrderedCall}
        Call: 40
        Method: «WPFEventHandling.MainWindow.OnMousePointerEnteredButton(Object sender, MouseEventArgs e)»

4.) The DataGrid inside the Window I’m trying to bind to, StackTraceDataGrid, which is read only, is implemented in XAML as follows:

<DataGrid Grid.Row="1" Grid.Column="0" Grid.ColumnSpan="2" 
          Name="StackTraceDataGrid" IsReadOnly="True"
          AutoGenerateColumns="False" Margin="10" 
          ItemsSource="StackTrace.OrderedStackTrace">
    <DataGrid.Columns>
        <DataGridTextColumn Header="Offest" 
         Binding="{Binding Call}" Width="60">
        </DataGridTextColumn>
        <DataGridTextColumn Header="Method" 
         Binding="{Binding Method}" Width="*">
        </DataGridTextColumn>
    </DataGrid.Columns>
</DataGrid>

When I build the solution containing this Window and  the child StackTraceDataGrid control, there are no errors nor compiler warnings. When I bring up the parent window that contains StakTraceDataGrid, the DataGrid and the two Text Columns, Offset and
Method, are rendered and formatted as expected, but each row in the DataGrid is empty.  When the Window is brought up, the following set of runtime messages appear for each pair of OrderedCall member values in each column for each row:

System.Windows.Data Error: 40 : BindingExpression path error: ‘Call’ property not found on ‘object’ »Char’ (HashCode=7471218)’. BindingExpression:Path=Call; DataItem=’Char’ (HashCode=7471218); target element is ‘TextBlock’ (Name=»); target property is ‘Text’
(type ‘String’)
System.Windows.Data Error: 40 : BindingExpression path error: ‘Method’ property not found on ‘object’ »Char’ (HashCode=7471218)’. BindingExpression:Path=Method; DataItem=’Char’ (HashCode=7471218); target element is ‘TextBlock’ (Name=»); target property is
‘Text’ (type ‘String’)

As far as I can tell, I think that my problem may lie in how I’ve defined the ItemsSource property for the DataGrid, and the Binding Path for each column for each instance of OrderedCall as I would like to have displayed in each row of the Grid.

I would really appreciate any corrections on how to resolve the BindingExpression path errors I’m seeing at runtime, as well as any background informatio on what each DataGrid Column is expecting for a Binding Path for each item in each row of the DataGrid.

Thank you in advance for your time and help, and I look forward to hearing from you soon.

Hello,

I have changed the title of my question because I don’t understand this error in the binding with the view.I know how to read it,but i don’t understand it’s cause or how should I change the syntax for it in a proper solution.This is my method for storing values:

View-Model:

public void SaveTeacher(object param)
        {

            using (DatabaseStudentsEntitiesLastStand db = new DatabaseStudentsEntitiesLastStand())
            {
              
                RegisterTeacher t = new RegisterTeacher();

                if (isChecked == true || t.CourseName != null)
                {
                    t.CourseName = courseName;

                }
                t.SNTeacher = SNTeacher;
                t.UserName = _UserName;
                t.pwd = pwd;
                t.fullName = fullName;
                t.education = education;

                db.RegisterTeachers.Attach(t);
               
                try
                {
                    db.SaveChanges();
                }
                catch (Exception ex)
                {
                   
                            MessageBox.Show(ex.Message);
                       
                }
            }
        }

This is the isChecked property:

private bool isChecked;
        public bool IsChecked
        {
            get
            {
                return IsChecked;
            }
            set
            {
                if (isChecked != value)
                {
                    isChecked = value;
                    NotifyOnPropertyChange("IsChecked");
                }
            }
        }
        private DelegateCommand checkCommand;
        public DelegateCommand CheckCommand
        {
            get
            {
                if (checkCommand == null)
                    checkCommand = new DelegateCommand(SaveTeacher, null);
                return checkCommand;
            }
            set
            {
                checkCommand = value;
                NotifyOnPropertyChange("CheckCommand");
            }
        }

This is the binding with the view:

<Button Content="Submit" Command="{Binding SaveCommand}"  HorizontalAlignment="Left" Margin="517,98.4,0,0" Grid.Row="2" VerticalAlignment="Top" Width="110" Height="40"/>
        <Button Content="Cancel"  HorizontalAlignment="Left" Margin="361,98.4,0,0" Grid.Row="2" VerticalAlignment="Top" Width="111" Height="40"/>
        <ListBox  HorizontalAlignment="Left" Name="coursesList" Height="240"   Margin="418,13.2,0,0" Grid.Row="1" VerticalAlignment="Top" Width="225" Grid.RowSpan="2"  ItemsSource="{Binding Courses}" >
            <ListBox.ItemTemplate>
                <DataTemplate>
                    <CheckBox x:Name="CheckBoxCourses" Click="CheckBoxCourses_Click"
                              IsChecked="{Binding Path=IsChecked,UpdateSourceTrigger=PropertyChanged,Mode=TwoWay}"
                           Command="{Binding CheckCommand,Mode=TwoWay}"

                            Content="{Binding Path=courseName,Mode=TwoWay}" Margin="0"/>


                </DataTemplate>
            </ListBox.ItemTemplate>
        </ListBox>

This is the Checked event:

private void CheckBoxCourses_Checked(object sender, RoutedEventArgs e)
        {
            var checkbox = sender as CheckBox;
            if(checkbox!=null)
            {
                checkbox.IsChecked =true;
            }


          
        }

What I have tried:

This is the entire error:

System.Windows.Data Error: 40 : BindingExpression path error: 'IsSelected' property not found on 'object' ''Cours' (HashCode=44335814)'. BindingExpression:Path=IsSelected; DataItem='Cours' (HashCode=44335814); target element is 'CheckBox' (Name=''); target property is 'IsChecked' (type 'Nullable`1')

I have tried multiple solutions with delegatecommand,selecteditem in the listbox and IsSelected property,read-only properties,nothing is working.Since I have tried many approaches,I have moved the property IsChecked from the view-model to the model class named «Cours» along with NotifyPropertyChanged(so it basically looks like the one I have in my example,only that it is in the model,not vm).Can someone please tell me what would be the problem based on this error?Please notify me if you need certain lines of code.

This article covers many techniques you can use to troubleshoot and debug your WPF application, including binding errors, exception handling, inspecting the VisualTree and logging.

Introduction

Windows Presentation Foundation (WPF) is a joy to develop rich user experiences with. Animations, bindings, reskinnable codeless interfaces, all backed up with traditional .Net programming all make for a very rapid development cycle. However, when something
goes wrong in that autogenerated super-sexy front-end, it is not always clear where the problem is.

This article will cover some of the methods for analyzing your WPF application, troubleshooting issues, and debugging seemingly obscure errors. 

↑
Return to Top

Binding Errors

When an error occurs in the binding framework, the notification is usually «silent», in that is doesn’t pop up an error dialog to the user. The error is instead displayed in the
Output Window of Visual Studio. Although the errors seem obscure at first, there are only a few common ones and they are quite helpful messages. 

Below are some typical errors and an explanation for each. 

This is a ComboBox inside a DataGridTemplateColumn. I am binding its ItemsSource to a property called PartIds. 

It is erroring when looking for the binding source, in other words the physical object to find the property on.

In this example, the error was because the source is a Window, not a UserControl. 

This is when the property name in the binding expression is wrong, or the property does not exist in the source object.

In this example, the property name was misspelled with a ‘z’.

Sometimes you will need a more detailed debugging output for binding. There are two ways to do this.

1. Changing Trace Level for All in Options

Click the Visual Studio menu Tools / Options, then open
Debugging and Output Window. In there you can change the
DataBinding output settings to Verbose or
All.

(click to enlarge)

2. Changing Trace Level on a Specific Binding

If you increase the trace level that way, you will get a WHOLE LOAD of messages for everything. Far better to target the specific binding where the error is. To do this, you can call on an Attached Property PresentationSources.TraceLevel and set it for just
the one binding.

For more information on the Trace Levels and what they represent,
read here. 

↑
Return to Top

WPF Tree Visualizer

The WPF Tree Visualizer comes built into Visual Studio, and is an essential tool to know about.

With it, you can break into the Visual Tree and inspect the actual generated elements and their properties.

To use a Visualizer, you click on the magnifying glass next to a variable name in
DataTips, a Watch window, or in the
Autos, Locals, or
Quick Watch window.

If you are visualizing a string object for example, you get a big grey text window. However, if you visualize a FrameworkElement, you get the WPF Tree Visualizer.

(click to enlarge) 

For a Quick Start on how to use the WPF TV, try this :
Debugging WPF — WPF Tree Visualizer + Helper Class

It also supplies a handy Attached Property you can drop in anywhere, without messing your code. 

The WPF Tree Visualizer is great for inspecting the VisualTree, but if you want to
change any of the properties, you have to look at the «Locals» tab, as shown below.

(click to enlarge)

Other inspection tools

WPF Tree Visualizer is usually enough for the experienced developer to find the problem, however there are plenty of tools around if you prefer to defer.

• WPF Inspector
• UI Spy (in Microsoft Windows SDK)
• Snoop
• XamlIT
• Mole
• Pistachio

↑
Return to Top

Debuging Your Code

Apart from the WPF Tree Visualiser, the debugger in WPF applications is the main way to break into your application, trace through and follow program execution to the point of failure.

This is all standard Visual Studio stuff, and I won’t waste time here reproducing what is available elsewhere:

• Debugging in Visual Studio
• Debugging Managed Code
• Debugging, Tracing, and Profiling

↑
Return to Top

Inner Exceptions

When your application raises an exception, and you are debugging in Visual Studio, you get the usual error dialog with the details. However, when the error is a XAML error, it is most frequently buried deeper in the exception details.

Within each exception is an Inner Exception, which is just another exception, but from a layer further down. If XAML throws an error about a missing resource, it re-raises the error as a meaningless «XAML Markup error». When you drill down deeper, you find
what resource the actual error relates to.

Josh Smith wrote best documents the joy of inner exceptions  here. 

↑
Return to Top

Unhandled Exceptions

It is impossible to protect against every possible fault that could happen, when your application is «out in the wild». 

There are however, ways to try and improve on the standard Windows error dialogue, and stack dump, which will help you find the fault.

When an exception is unhandled by your application, there are several Unhandled Exception events that you can tap into and handle.

You can download and test all five handlers here :
Handling Unhandled Exceptions in WPF (The most complete collection of handlers)

Application.DispatcherUnhandledException

This is triggered when the UI thread causes an unhandled exception. You can attach a handler to it either in App.xaml

… or App.xaml.cs

What you get in the handler arguments is a standard exception. Handle as you like, preferably write it to a permissions safe file location.

You can also set e.Handled to true if you want to try to overcome the error and move on

Sometimes the error is too severe, and your application still crashes. But at least you have hopefully captured something useful, before it did.

AppDomain.CurrentDomain.UnhandledException

If the error is not on the UI thread, then the previous handler won’t catch it. It is solely for the Dispatcher thread. To capture errors on any other thread, you need this second one.

This handler is attached in the Startup event handler, which can again be hooked into from mark-up:

… or in code:

Notice this uses an ExceptionObject, which is derived from Exception, so we can simply cast it back, for a generic exception handler, as shown below.

Also notice the ExceptionObject has an IsTerminating flag.

TaskScheduler.UnobservedTaskException

This exception happens when a Task has an «unobserved exception», and is about to trigger the «exception escalation policy», which by default
terminates the process.

Again, we can try to prevent crashing, in this case by calling the e.SetObserved method, which marks the exception as «observed» and prevents exception escalation towards a termination (crash). 

The catch-all Unhandled Handler!

Putting those three handlers together, we get the following:

In the examples below, I show how to try and mark the exceptions as handled/observed, and continue execution. However, you may just want to close «gracefully», with a polite message, instead of an all-out crash.

One thing is certain, you will probably want a unified way of handling the exceptions, wherever they come from, as shown below.

Drilling down to include the Inner Exceptions

As mentioned before, the real reason for an error could be buried several layers down in Inner Exceptions. The three handlers above shared one error logging method, shown below, which iterates down till there are no more Inner Exceptions.

Early attention to error handling in your application will always help production, because most bugs occur during development.

See Logging below.

↑
Return to Top

Commenting Out and Binary Chopping

If a bug in your application is being particularly hard to find, there may be only one way left to find the culprit. It’s very simple, and is often simply the fastest way to drill down to the offender.

The method is simply to remove (or comment out) sections of your code, or XAML, until you get execution PAST the error.

Then you start replacing parts of the removed code, until you find the exact control or method that is causing the problem.

It is referred to as binary chopping because you cut the code into two, to get past the error, then in two again, replacing half of the removed code, and so on until you get down to the offending code/xaml.

You can comment out huge chunks of your code or markup in Visual Studio with ctrl-k + c, then ctrl-k + u to uncomment. Both functions also available in the edit / advanced menu.

This is one of the advantages of writing your application to the MVVM design pattern. MVVM separates your UI (View) from the business logic supplied by the ViewModel, or the Model itself. This means the View is much more loosely coupled, and there are no
hooks from code-behind, acting directly on controls, like referring to controls by name (x:Name) like MyTextBox.Text = «hello». In MVVM the emphasis is all on the bindings, so commenting out half your XAML just means less binding requests, and commenting out
half your code/properties means more binding errors, but not a crash. 

Even an MVVM setup can have problems when you try to comment out half the markup. Controls may be relying on other controls, with direct biding in XAML. So there is always a certain amount of «knock-on» effects that also need commenting out, but experience
often shows it is quite simply a very fast and effective way to find the sinner.

Just make sure you keep a copy of the original file (or have recently committed your code to source control) before such dramatic actions. Just in case you make an edit that looses your comment/cut history

↑
Return to Top

Is It Reproducable?

When you hit a brick wall, many people turn to the
MSDN forums, for help and advice from other developers. Often, just the act of trying to put a problem into words for others to understand is equivalent to having a colleague look over your shoulder, which often catches those obvious «too close to the trees»
kind of mistakes that we all make.

However, if the problem isn’t obvious from your description, you will get a much quicker and accurate response from the forum if you supply a
reproduceable example of your problem in a few code snippets.

Quite often, when you try to reproduce the problem in a new project, you will often find the culpret anyway! 

↑
Return to Top

Logging

The other age old method of tracing bugs in your application, both in development and once released, is to keep a log of messages from every notable step of your application.

If your bug is of a composite nature (comprising of several different causes), or developing after several iterations, or at an unknown point, you will need to build a picture of what is happening, before you can even know where to start. 

Logging Level

Writing comments and session data to a log file means scattering «WriteToLog» type methods throughout your code. It is therefore common to build a «LogLevel» parameter into your methods, allowing you to control the amount of spam that gets written. In a
published application you would only want to capture critical messages, but with a config file flag or startup parameter that allows you to crank up the debug logging (logging ALL messages), for a client that experiences a bug. 

Repository Choice

A log repository can be anything from a text file, to a database. One word of caution however. It is no good logging errors to a database if it was a database connection error. So file based logging for critical errors is strongly advised. Then you simply
have a check method on application startup, for any waiting critical error files, that may have been generated when the application crashed. You can then ‘process’ them (into a database, or send by email) and then delete.

It is as explained, quite simple to create your own logging architecture for your application. The key to success is to START EARLY! Don’t try to strap error handling or logging on later, as it will never be as useful as if you had started from the outset.
Also, the majority of bugs are caused during development anyway, so early attention to error handling and logging may take slightly longer to code, but will help speed up the overall production process. 

Why Reinvent the Wheel

You could have a lot of fun building your own error logging framework, that is thread safe and foolproof. Or if you’re pushed for time or more interested in higher things, why not just adopt a tried and tested logging framework. Here are some options, but
you should shop around, as new kids often come on the block. 

Log4Net

One of the most established frameworks. «log4net is a tool to help the programmer output log statements to a variety of output targets. In case of problems with an application, it is helpful to enable logging so that
the problem can be located. With log4net it is possible to enable logging at runtime without modifying the application binary. The log4net package is designed so that log statements can remain in shipped code without incurring a high performance cost. It follows
that the speed of logging (or rather not logging) is crucial. At the same time, log output can be so voluminous that it quickly becomes overwhelming. One of the distinctive features of log4net is the notion of hierarchical loggers. Using these loggers it is
possible to selectively control which log statements are output at arbitrary granularity. log4net is designed with two distinct goals in mind: speed and flexibility» 

ELMAH

A very popular framework. «Stands for Logging Modules and Handlers. An application-wide error logging facility that is completely pluggable. It can be dynamically added to a running ASP.NET web application, or even all ASP.NET web applications
on a machine, without any need for re-compilation or re-deployment.» 

NLog

Newer but 3rd popular «A logging platform for .NET with rich log routing and management capabilities. It can help you produce and manage high-quality logs for your application regardless of its size or complexity.»

NuGet

All of the above frameworks are available through NuGet. If you don’t already have NuGet, it is like an App store for Visual Studio application development. If you want a logging framework, or an MVVM framework, simply open the package manager and search.
Results are listed by popularity. Click to install, and the package gets downloaded and integrated into your current project. That means all the dlls are added and registered, and any supporting files are added to your project. It takes all the pain out of
adding supporting packages to your project. This is a must for all developers. No excuses, get it now! 

↑
Return to Top

See Also

• Troubleshooting Portal
• See routed events article
  http://code.msdn.microsoft.com/silverlight/WPFSilverlight-Routed-49a16914

 ↑
Return to Top

Community Resources

• Debugging WPF — WPF Tree Visualizer + Helper Class
• How to: Use the WPF Tree Visualizer
• How to: Display WPF Trace Information
• Trees in WPF
• Breakpoints
• Locals Window
• Threads Window
• Output Window
• Exception.InnerException Property
• Application.DispatcherUnhandledException Event
• AppDomain.UnhandledException Event
• Dispatcher.UnhandledException Event
• Tips on how to debug and learn about WPF
• WPF performance Suite (in Windows SDK)
• UI Spy (in Windows SDK)
• Spy++
• StyleSnooper
• Optimizing WPF Application Performance
• Debugging Tools (.NET Framework)
• Debugging in Visual Studio
• Debugging Managed Code
• Debugging, Tracing, and Profiling 

↑
Return to Top

I guess it is the error message that seems having nothing to do with Win Form makes people hesitate to response to your question. The error message looks like somehow related to WPF UI. Also, when you say «… show this in debug», what does «debug» mean? where exactly do you see the error message? A pop-up window in AutoCAD, where you can click either «Detail» to see more error message, or «Continue», which would either let AutoCAD continue. if the error is not that fatal, or let AutoCAD die?

Anyway, if your Form1 is a true win form, regardless the strange error, your code in the CommandMethod is very wrong, in 2 ways:

1. You DO NOT show dialog form (modal view) with Form.ShowDialog() in AutoCAD .NET API add-in. You must use AutoCAD .NET API method

Autodesk.AutoCAD.ApplicationServices.Application.ShowModalDialog[Window]()

2. You DO NOT sandwich all the code (showing the dialog box, and then user may do something to AutoCAD by interacting with the form) with a Transaction and only not commit it (which means whatever user does to AutoCAD would be aborted when you close the dialog form. That is why the line drawn by the button clicking action is not there: it is lost after you close the form. because the outer-most transaction is not commited (thus, aborted automatically).

While letting UI’s event handler (button clicking, in your case) directly interact with AutoCAD isn’t a very good code practice, I think you can live with that for now (as beginner?), thus, the simple fix to your code is to modify the CommandMethed as following:

       [CommandMethod("ACADPipe")]
        public static void pipe()
        {
            using (Form1 form1 = new Form1())
            {
                Application.ShowModalDialog(form1);
            }
        }

And, in your drawTestLine_Click() method, you might want to add

ed.UpdateScreen()

at the end of the Transaction, if you want the newly created line to be seen without dismissing the dialog box.

public string Name;

public string Name{ get; set; }

this.DataContext = this;

DataContext="{Binding RelativeSource={RelativeSource Self}}"

Tags:

C#

Wpf

Xaml

Binding

I noticed, that the application output is filled with messages, that a BindingExpression path error occured, when using a ComboBox:

System.Windows.Data Error: 40 : BindingExpression path error: '(adonisExtensions:WatermarkExtension.IsWatermarkVisible)' property not found on 'object' ''ComboBox' (Name='')'. BindingExpression:Path=(adonisExtensions:WatermarkExtension.IsWatermarkVisible); DataItem='ComboBox' (Name=''); target element is 'TextBox' (Name='PART_EditableTextBox'); target property is 'NoTarget' (type 'Object')
Exception thrown: 'MS.Internal.Xaml.Parser.GenericTypeNameParser.TypeNameParserException' in System.Xaml.dll
System.Windows.Data Error: 40 : BindingExpression path error: '(adonisExtensions:WatermarkExtension.Watermark)' property not found on 'object' ''ComboBox' (Name='')'. BindingExpression:Path=(adonisExtensions:WatermarkExtension.Watermark); DataItem='ComboBox' (Name=''); target element is 'ContentPresenter' (Name='PlaceholderHost'); target property is 'Content' (type 'Object')
Exception thrown: 'MS.Internal.Xaml.Parser.GenericTypeNameParser.TypeNameParserException' in System.Xaml.dll

These two errors occur for every ComboBox in my view.
I’m using the latest version of AdonisUI (1.9), I haven’t noticed this with earlier versions but I have not tested it specifically with other versions of AdonisUI.
This is the view, the error occurs, the following code snippet is the ComboBox in the view:

<ComboBox Grid.Column="0"
          ItemsSource="{Binding InstallerBundles}"
          SelectedItem="{Binding SelectedInstallerBundle}"
          HorizontalContentAlignment="Stretch"
          ScrollViewer.CanContentScroll="True"
          VirtualizingStackPanel.IsVirtualizing="True"
          VirtualizingStackPanel.VirtualizationMode="Recycling"
          VirtualizingStackPanel.ScrollUnit="Pixel">

    <ComboBox.ItemsPanel>
        <ItemsPanelTemplate >
            <VirtualizingStackPanel/>
        </ItemsPanelTemplate>
    </ComboBox.ItemsPanel>
</ComboBox>

The view for an installer bundle consists of only a single TextBox:

<TextBlock TextTrimming="CharacterEllipsis"
           Text="{Binding Name}"/>

There seems to be no error while using the application, I just wanted to check, if the errors can be ignored.